Explaining group-level traits requires distinguishing process from product


Journal article


Karthik Panchanathan, Sarah Mathew, Charles Perreault
Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2014

View PDF Semantic Scholar DOI PubMed
Cite

Cite

APA   Click to copy
Panchanathan, K., Mathew, S., & Perreault, C. (2014). Explaining group-level traits requires distinguishing process from product. Behavioral and Brain Sciences.


Chicago/Turabian   Click to copy
Panchanathan, Karthik, Sarah Mathew, and Charles Perreault. “Explaining Group-Level Traits Requires Distinguishing Process from Product.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences (2014).


MLA   Click to copy
Panchanathan, Karthik, et al. “Explaining Group-Level Traits Requires Distinguishing Process from Product.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2014.


BibTeX   Click to copy

@article{karthik2014a,
  title = {Explaining group-level traits requires distinguishing process from product},
  year = {2014},
  journal = {Behavioral and Brain Sciences},
  author = {Panchanathan, Karthik and Mathew, Sarah and Perreault, Charles}
}

Abstract

Abstract Smaldino is right to argue that we need a richer theory of group-level traits. He is wrong, however, in limiting group-level traits to units of cultural selection, which require explanations based on group selection. Traits are best understood when explanations focus on both process (i.e., selection) and product (i.e., adaptation). This approach can distinguish group-level traits that arise through within-group processes from those that arise through between-group processes.